Skip to main content

Bill Proposes Kids Under 13 Will Be Banned From Social Media

 


Today, United States senators unveiled their plans to ban kids under the age of 13 from using social media without parental consent. They’re calling the bipartisan bill “The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act” or “Kids’ Online Safety Act.” If passed, it would:

  • Set strict age limits for social media.
  • Restrict young children’s actions on social media platforms.
  • Prevent children from creating accounts without parental involvement.
  • Allow the government to control how platforms engage with young social media users.

Overview of the Protecting Kids on Social Media Act

Platforms included within the legislation would have to obtain a parent’s or guardian’s consent before creating new accounts for anyone under the age of 18. Furthermore, for ages 13 and below, there would be restrictions in place on which accounts with which they are able to view and interact. Meaning the law prevents even authorized account holders aged 13 and below from engaging with users ages 18 and up. Under the new law, those younger users would theoretically see no content posted by adults at all.

The Need for an Online Safety Act

As NPR pointed out, “Back in 2017, psychologist Jean Twenge set off a firestorm in the field of psychology.” Her intensive study on the effects social media and smartphones had on teens were startling. As smartphones and social media use drastically increased from 2012 to 2017, so did signs of depression and poor mental health among teens. Studies such as Twenge’s have not fallen on deaf ears. Senator Tom Cotton, a sponsor of the bill, proclaimed at a news conference, “Big tech has exposed our kids to dangerous content and disturbed people.” A parent himself, he continued, “Moms and dads have felt helpless while their kids suffer, sometimes leading to devastating tragedies.” 

With social media use and teen depression soaring simultaneously, it’s no wonder the government is taking action. But between content control and parental consent for minors’ accounts, they hope to see less daunting statistics in the future.

Identity Verification

Another sizable change that The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act is set to enforce is identity verification. Currently, it is easy for children to pass as adults on many social media platforms by simply selecting “I am above the age of 18 years old”. With the passing of The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act, this lackadaisical, take-your-word-for it “safety measure” would be no more. 

As a result of a children’s privacy law included in COPPA, most major social media platforms should be banning children under the age of 13 already. The law itself has been in place for a long time, but enforcement measures have been widely insufficient. With the passing of the new bill and identity verification, change will be inevitable. 

 As you can imagine, verifying the identity of a child or teen would be a tall task considering most do not have a government-issued identification card such as a passport or driver’s license. As a solvent, parent’s identify verification will be accepted. 

The Pros Vs Cons of Identity Verification

Identity verification will certainly solve the issue of children using social media with zero to no restrictions. It will also prevent kids from using social media at all without parental consent. The downside of the implementation of identity verification is that it will force the hand of both children and parents to cough up even more data and personal information to the government, social media platforms, and third-party identity verifiers. Even in 2023, data breaches and misuse show no signs of slowing down. If anything, data exploitation and misuse are seemingly trending upwards. This could deter parents from allowing their children to use social media altogether before they come of an older age. 

Pushback

As Senator Brian Schatz pointed out, “The tech industry is going to come at this bill, and every other kids’ online safety bill, with everything it’s got.” The bill is meant to protect children. However, the measures needed to be bring platforms into compliance will set a massive burden on the shoulders of tech and social media companies. Tech company NetChoice has already spoken out against the bill saying it, “would require massive, widespread data collection and retention, undermining Americans’ privacy and security.”

With the mental health and safety of minors top-of-mind for The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act, it’s still no secret that even the best-intentioned measures come at a price. The price on this particular bill being privacy. What do you think? Parents: Is this a bill you can get behind?

Labels:
Location: Littlerock, CA 93543, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Historic Theater Preservation Adds New Meaning to “Save the Drama” on LA’s South Broadway

  Featured image credit: Afpeach It would be a passably snappy intro to drop a statement like, “There’s only one Broadway”, but it’s not exactly true, is it? Of course, there’s Broadway in Manhattan, a concrete river veritably flowing with theatre. That would be the Broadway that everyone knows. But what about the Broadway in Chennai, India, a thoroughfare regionally recognized for its wealth of commercial establishments? Or bustling Broadway Street in Sydney, Australia, offering universities, transportation, and even some scenery for David Bowie’s 1983 music video for “Let’s Dance.” Los Angeles even has a Broadway and, while it may not be even close to as celebrated as Manhattan’s variety, we still think it’s pretty special. Our Broadway is known for its theaters. Okay, yes, we know what you’re thinking, but it’s not really the same thing. Manhattan’s Broadway is all about theatre ; the craft of stage production and all that comes with it. LA’s Broadway is all ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How the Rise of the “New Listings Near Me” Search Changed the Game for Homebuyers

  Perhaps it didn’t have the cultural impact of “new phone, who dis?” but the search phrase “new listings near me” flipped the way buyers search for homes on its… well, its roof. It’s a direct example of the effectiveness of location-based searching, a far cry from the newspaper ads and weekend open houses of yore. By typing “new listings near me” in a search engine from a phone or laptop, a seemingly inexhaustible list of options is produced for the busy buyer, giving an instant idea of what to expect from the local housing market.  Location Matters in More Ways Than Ever Photo credit: Envato Location, location, location. It’s as relevant as ever, but for more reasons than one. That’s because with the rise of GPS-augmented mobile apps, the search for homes (among other things) has become hyperlocalized. Say you’re meeting a friend at a trendy cafe in Los Feliz, and you’re so taken with the neighborhood that you’d consider moving there. Simply type “new ...
Post a Comment
Read more

10 Crazy Conspiracy Theories That Could Only Happen in LA

  Los Angeles can be weird. Often it’s an endearing quality. Other times, not so much. It’s no wonder this city has conjured its own collection of crazy conspiracy theories specific to our locale. Sometimes, they even pop up in this blog, like the time we discussed the legend of Devil’s Gate Dam being a portal to hell. Yeah, that happened. But today, we have 10 LA-centric conspiracy theories we’ve never talked about before. Some are clearly lunacy. After all, LA is a crazy city, so our myths, legends, and lore need to keep pace with our daily lives. Others… well, they might have something to them.  Traffic Tribulations Photo credit: 4X4 Blazer 1776 It seems that the global pandemic changed everything… especially how frequently people say “The pandemic changed everything.” But much of the world has had time to slip back into the old routines. Just ask any Angeleno stuck in the city’s legendary rush “hour” (which is actually about 13 hours long). As more...
Post a Comment
Read more